ایمان

ادیان ابراهیمی

ایمان

ادیان ابراهیمی

ایمان

Writer, Philosopher, Life Architect, Time Architect
نویسنده، فیلسوف، معمار زندگی، معمار زمان

دنبال کنندگان ۳ نفر
این وبلاگ را دنبال کنید

Despair is a sickness of the spirit, of the self, and so can have three forms:

  1. being unconscious in despair of having a self (inauthentic despair)
  2. not wanting in despair to be oneself
  3. wanting in despair to be oneself
The sickness unto death - S. Kierkegaard.
 
If you are reading this, at least we can say that, there is a possibility for you to not be in state of (inauthentic despair) 1.
 

Despair: hopelessness of doing a thing in order to improve worrying situation. 

  • یَحیَی

It is very important in life to know when your cue comes.

 

Important in Life 36 I A 279 - S. Kierkegaard.

  • یَحیَی

... But this I thought was the meaning of life, that the individual shook off the habit of accepting the favours of difference, should that be tempting, steeled himself against its humiliation, should that weigh down on him, in order to find the universal, what is common to all human beings, to concern himself only with that. Oh! how beautiful to lose oneself in this way. But then I thought again that in the having of this concern the meaning of life was to be concerned for oneself as if the particular individual was all there was. Oh! how beautiful thus to find oneself in the universal! If the universal is the rule then the individual is the paradigm [corrected from: demand]; if the universal is the demand then the individual is the fulfillment; if the universal is everything, if the universal says everything, then the particular individual believes that the everything is said about him - him alone.

So if the place and context here did not require a signature, none would be needed, for again it is infinitely inconsequential who has said it (as though the favoured one said it, the one who was one said it, the one who was wronged being in no position to say it, since after all they all have it in them to do it.)

Is signature not required? 46 VII I B 200 - S. Kierkegaard.

  • یَحیَی

Suffering from mental illness that almost comes from a strong desire to thinking, in order to more discovering, more exploring, more finding, and more fulfilling.

  • یَحیَی

Feeling very sorry for something that you have done wrong at past, why? Because you mightn't or might know how to do that. A feel what is cause of your suffering in future. A feel which deal with you conscience. A feel that eats you like a worm. 

Conscience-Stricken is a purify process, which helps you to be in Love, instead of hatE. In my opinion, in conscience-stricken state, your conscience is trying to be free from bad points that are made by hate; and this is enough to have Love.

Lord! Give us weak eyes for things of no account, and eyes of full clarity in all your truth.

Soren Kierkegaard - The Sickness unto Death 

 

  • یَحیَی

You always need one more light positively to identify another. Imagine it quite dark and then one point of light appears; you would be quite unable to place it, since no spatial relation can be made out in the dark. Only when one more light appears can you fix the place of the first, in relation to it.

One more light is needed 15 April 34 I A I - S. Kierkegaard.

  • یَحیَی

Erotic love and marriage are really just a deeper corroboration of self-love, with two people involved in self-love. That is exactly why married people become so content, prosper so vegetatively for pure love is not adapted to worldly life in the way self-love is. The lonely person therefore lacks self-love, which married people express by saying that person is selfish, since married people assume that marriage is love.

Self-Love 47 VIII I A I90 - S. Kierkegaard.

  • یَحیَی

On the contrary, doing ambitiously, makes you feel better than wait to see what will happen. But if you do it hard and try to make your future, you will find that so many things are there which you can't change never. After sometimes, this contradictory will be attached to your entire life. 

Every flower in my heart becomes an ice fern. 37 II A 64I - Soren Kierkegaard

  • یَحیَی

Always doing like 'the others' is a very convenient piece of wisdom; in addition, it brings all earthly benefits and respect - for being wise. One person flatters the other because he regards it as wise to do so.  

 

Doing like 'the others' 48 IX A I32 - S. Kierkegaard.

 

What to say here?

By doing like 'the others', you can be wise as well as respectful person, from 'other's angle'.

By doing not like 'the others', you may never can be wise at your lifetime, from 'other's angle'.

And also remember, we are living in a society, so other's angle could be an important parameter in our life.

 

So with reference to all those things that we know, at least we could accept that doing like 'the others' is much easier than doing not 'like others'.

 

 

  • یَحیَی

In The Name of GOD (The only words)


The Analysis of Reality
By Mehdi Bateni
Email: Bateni.mehdi@gmail.com
Semester II – Student Seminar – Feb 2011
University of Pune
Contents:
Introduction
I- Authentic Logic
II- Impossibility of expression of Analysis of Reality
III- Analysis of Reality from my angle

2
Introduction
When we are discussing about one subject, this is very important that we know what we are talking about exactly and clearly.
In this paper, I want to discuss about reality and analysis of that, and then by using of some simple argument, demonstrate that we cannot analyze the reality in clear way. My meaning by clearly way is this that if we intend to investigate a thing like a subject in analytical manner, - what we want to do now - we have to use of logical as a mathematical way. Because of, we don’t have any doubt about the exactness, rightness and validity of that way and I think all of us allow that mathematics is best and unique way to express a thing in logical and analytical manner.
In part I, I am trying to show why mathematic is authentic logic, and discuss about why we need to use of authentic logic.
In part II, there are some statements that we need for our discussion. If I can express that the possibility of expression of Analysis of Reality is Impossible, then we can accept that there is impossibility of Analysis of Reality. And this will be ascertained with the help of analytic logic.
In part III, when we could not investigate that the analysis of reality is not logical and analytical as a mathematical manner, I will go to analyze of reality from my angle, and will discuss about some important parameter of reality which I think that attention to them is necessary.
But here, I need to think more for completing my view about reality, because there is and must be many and so much thing to explain, and of course this need a lot of time for search and discovery. And because of this, part III will be presented generally and shortly.
Therefore this is part I:

3
I- Authentic Logic
At first, if we want to start a discussion, we have to have some common grammars and rules which make us able to discussing. And if there is an analytic problem or a discussion in analytic way – what we are discussing about Reality now – unquestionably, Logic is the way.
What is Logic?
Answer to this question is very simple and yet difficult. Meaning of the word “Logic” according to Cambridge dictionary is “A particular way of thinking, especially one which is reasonable and based on good judgment.” According to Critical Thinking, Logic is a unique authentic and reliable instrument for analysis and obtaining the answer which mind is trying to find. Logic also need to firm, consistent, solid and steadfast reasons for working otherwise it cannot work in any cases.
What are the conditions required for analysis?
In logic, the words necessity and sufficiency refer to the implicational relationships between statements. The assertion that one statement is a necessary and sufficient condition of another statement means that, the former statement is true if and only if the latter is true.
 A necessary condition of a statement must be satisfied for the statement to be true. Formally, statement P is a necessary condition of statement Q, if Q implies P. For example in order for it to be true that “John is a bachelor” it is necessary that it be also true that he is 1. Unmarried and that 2. He be male - those are the necessary conditions for the statement "John is a bachelor" to be true.

4
 A sufficient condition is one that, if satisfied, assures the statement's truth. Formally, a statement P is a sufficient condition of a statement Q, if P implies Q. For example stating that "John is a bachelor" implies that John is male. So knowing that it is true that John is a bachelor is sufficient in order to know that it is also true that he is a male.
So, if statement p is this: “There is possibility of expression of Analysis of Reality”. In order for it to be true, is necessary that at least three statements must be True, which are:
q1- There is information.
q2- There is process of analyzing.
q3- There is a common language for proving the information.
If one of these necessary conditions be false, statement p is False.
q1 Ʌ q2 Ʌ q3 → p (Conclusion 1)

...

  • یَحیَی