Life

a concept:

Life is a true position.

Every happening in a true position is logically true.

When something is true, there is no need to change.

SO, change of life is wrong.

Just be aware of meaning.

Different Situations

In the past, there was limitation of common meaning between me and the others, which drove me to current situation. And now, there is limitation of common meaningful language between me and the others, which will drive me to next different situation.

Philosophical Suicide - a misunderstanding of Kierkegaard's Philosophy

Religious, spiritual, or abstract belief in a transcendent realm, being, or idea: a solution in which one believes in the existence of a reality that is beyond the Absurd, and, as such, has meaning. Kierkegaard stated that a belief in anything beyond the Absurd requires a non-rational but perhaps necessary religious acceptance in such an intangible and empirically unprovable thing (now commonly referred to as a "leap of faith"). However, Camus regarded this solution, and others, as "philosophical suicide". 

Wikipedia - Absurdism

Why is it so? This misunderstanding - philosophical suicide - occurs because of having no experience of belief's state, which is not reachable for everyone. There could be also a misconception of goal of philosophy in human's life.

Lord! Give us weak eyes for things of no account (not importance), and eyes of full clarity in all truth.

The Sickness unto Death - S. Kierkegaard

Is signature not required? 46 VII I B 200 - S. Kierkegaard.

... But this I thought was the meaning of life, that the individual shook off the habit of accepting the favours of difference, should that be tempting, steeled himself against its humiliation, should that weigh down on him, in order to find the universal, what is common to all human beings, to concern himself only with that. Oh! how beautiful to lose oneself in this way. But then I thought again that in the having of this concern the meaning of life was to be concerned for oneself as if the particular individual was all there was. Oh! how beautiful thus to find oneself in the universal! If the universal is the rule then the individual is the paradigm [corrected from: demand]; if the universal is the demand then the individual is the fulfillment; if the universal is everything, if the universal says everything, then the particular individual believes that the everything is said about him - him alone.

So if the place and context here did not require a signature, none would be needed, for again it is infinitely inconsequential who has said it (as though the favoured one said it, the one who was one said it, the one who was wronged being in no position to say it, since after all they all have it in them to do it.)

Is signature not required? 46 VII I B 200 - S. Kierkegaard.